🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.